Legal Opinion
People v. Berger
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1960No. Crim. 7085PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
Defendants were convicted of two counts of violation of Penal Code, section 266h, pimping. Defendant Lafferty alone appeals from the judgment of conviction.
In the first count of the information, the defendants were charged with violation of section 266h of the Penal Code in that knowing Velzora C. Wise to be a prostitute they did live and derive support and maintenance from her earnings as a prostitute. By the third count of the information they were charged with the violation of Penal Code, section 266h, but this count named Emma Smith as the prostitute upon whose…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. De PaulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. CreeganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. PangelinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. LangloisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.