Legal Opinion

People v. De Paula

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1954No. Crim. 5616PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant, who admitted two prior felony convictions, was found guilty by a jury on the charge of using a minor for the purpose of transporting heroin in violation of section 11714 of the Health and Safety Code. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial. As grounds for reversal, he argues these points: (1) failure of the court to instruct on the law pertaining to the testimony of an accomplice and the necessity for corroboration thereof; (2) insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction; and (3) inconsistency of the jury verdicts. We have…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. HarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. PoindexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. Frederick G.California Court of Appeal · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API