Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1933No. Docket No. 252PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, J., pro tem.

The defendants having been arraigned upon the information, the defendant June Young entered a demurrer to the second count of the information. Her demurrer was sustained by the trial court and judgment entered dismissing her. The appeal here presented is by the People from that judgment. The crime involved is defined in the law as follows (Stats. 1911, p. 10) : “Any male person who, knowing a female person to be a prostitute, shall live or derive support or maintenance, in whole or in part, . . . shall be guilty of a felony, to-wit: pimping, ...”

The question presented by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BartolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API