In re Lux
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Mateo County, settling an executor's accounts. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The superior court made an order settling certain accounts rendered by the executors of the estate of Charles Lux, deceased, to which accounts exceptions had theretofore been filed by certain devisees named in the will of the deceased. This appeal is taken by said devisees, and is from so much of the order as fails to charge the executors interest upon money which the court found was improperly paid by them to the widow as a family allowance, and in so far as it fails to require a full accounting of the partnership affairs of the firm of Miller & Lux, of which firm the deceased was a member…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schieffelin v. StewartNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Cruce v. CruceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- In re Estate of PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re Estate of KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In re ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Dougherty v. DoughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1906
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.