Legal Opinion

Kauffman v. Eckhardt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1935No. 30,556PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 263 N.W. 610, 264 N.W. 781. Defendants Edward and Lilla Eckhardt appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is one for partition, and for sale of the lands involved if it shall appear that partition cannot be had without great prejudice to the parties. The lands involved are two separate farms in Blue Earth county. Each farm contains 240 acres, each has the necessary farm buildings upon it, and each, as we gather from the evidence, is separately farmed and occupied. The farms are used for dairy stock and crop purposes and are located in a fertile farm…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hazen v. WebbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Williamson Investment Co. v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Clough v. CromwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Ford v. KirkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Swogger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Gelin v. HollisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Behrendt v. RassmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API