Legal Opinion

Gelin v. Hollister

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1946No. 34,147PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 24 N.W.2d 496. In an action for the partition of a piece of downtown real estate in the city of St. Paul, the court found the interests of the respective parties to be as follows:

Plaintiffs:

Anna E. Gelin ...................................... 20/300 Frederick Gaertner ................................. 9/300

Defendants:

Emma Lambrecht Jenny ............................... 54/300 Frederick J. Lambrecht, deceased (represented herein by his administrators) ........................... 75/300 Michael Lambrecht, incompetent (represented herein by his guardian, Anna M. Hollister)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Tomlinson v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Mongeon v. BurkebileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Carter v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In re RiednerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API