Gelin v. Hollister
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 24 N.W.2d 496. In an action for the partition of a piece of downtown real estate in the city of St. Paul, the court found the interests of the respective parties to be as follows:
Plaintiffs:
Anna E. Gelin ...................................... 20/300 Frederick Gaertner ................................. 9/300
Defendants:
Emma Lambrecht Jenny ............................... 54/300 Frederick J. Lambrecht, deceased (represented herein by his administrators) ........................... 75/300 Michael Lambrecht, incompetent (represented herein by his guardian, Anna M. Hollister)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Tomlinson v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Mongeon v. BurkebileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Carter v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In re RiednerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.