Legal Opinion
Swogger v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1955No. 36,382PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
In an action for the partition of real estate, defendant appeals from an order denying Ms motion for a new trial.
The parties to tMs action, as tenants in common, are the sole owners of a 425-acre farm in Freeborn county in the following proportions : Plaintiff — Isabel Swogger, 7/16; plaintiff — Dwight Haney, 1/3 of 7/16; plaintiff — Harold Haney, 1/3 of 7/16; plaintiff — Delmas Haney, 1/3 of 7/16; and defendant — John W. Taylor, 2/16.
The farm is operated principally as a truck farm and has storage and railroad shipping facilities for the products raised. The owners as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hall V, HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- State Bank of Milan v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Trowbridge v. DonnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Crombie v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Carlson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.