Legal Opinion

Clough v. Cromwell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

These are two petitions for the partition *327of land in West Tisbury and Edgartown on the southerly shore of Martha’s Vineyard. The cases come up by appeal from a decree in each case ordering a sale of the property at public auction.

In the first petition, filed May 8, 1922, seven individuals joined as petitioners against three respondents for a partition of all the land in question. Later, when it appeared that one Daniel C. Look, not a party to the petition, was a part owner of two of the lots described therein, an amendment was filed eliminating them from the first petition, and a second…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aronson v. OrlovMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Hastings v. RiderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. MackintoshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Inhabitants of Westport v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Hunt v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boston & Albany Railroad v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Kauffman v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Delta Materials Corp. v. BagdonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. Clough v. CromwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API