Legal Opinion

Smith v. Olson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1926No. File No. 6073PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Action by plaintiff, as superintendent of banks of the state of South Dakota in charge of the closed Commercial & Savings Bank of Sioux Falls, to recover from defendant the full amount of his liability as a stockholder in said bank. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, from which judgment and an order -denying his motion for new trial defendant appeals.

Appellant contended that, although he was a stockholder of the closed bank according to its books and records, he was nodi such in fact, claiming that his stock subscription was obtained by false and fraudulent representations and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lamar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Davidson v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Union Nat. Bank of Omaha v. HalleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lawhead v. Board of TrusteesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Belmont v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bush v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Farmers' State Bank v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API