Legal Opinion

Kauke v. Lindsay Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1941No. Civ. 2579PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONWAT, J.,

pro tem. — Petitioner and appellant, Ruth R. Kauke, in this action sought a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants, Lindsay Unified School District and the Board of Trustees thereof, to employ her as a full time elementary school teacher under the provisions of the California School Code relating to teachers’ tenure. The trial court denied the petition and refused to issue a peremptory writ of mandate, from which ruling this appeal is taken.

This appeal is taken upon the judgment roll, and the findings of fact made by the trial court present the uncontroverted facts of the case.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Fresno City High School District v. De CaristoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re SekuguchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krouser v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API