Legal Opinion
Fresno City High School District v. De Caristo
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1939No. Civ. 2253PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment permitting respondent to dismiss appellant and to terminate her employment as a permanent teacher in the Fresno City High School District.
On December 9, 1937, respondent prepared and had delivered to appellant by United States mail the following notice:
“NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DISMISS EMPLOYEE.
“The Board of Education of the Fresno City High School District charges that there exist the following causes for your dismissal as an employee of said District, to-wit:
“1. That in violation of Subdivision 1 of Section IXa of the Rules and Regulations of said Board of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- County of Los Angeles v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fresno City High School District v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Tucker v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- West Virginia Board of Dental Examiners v. StorchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Board of Trustees v. PoriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.