Legal Opinion

In Re Sekuguchi

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1932No. Docket No. 1664PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. A complaint was filed against the petitioner which charged that on the eighteenth day of April, 1932, the petitioner “did willfully, unlawfully, and lewdly distribute and exhibit obscene and indecent photographs and pictures”. He was convicted, the judgment recites, of committing the offense described in the complaint.

The provisions of Penal Code, section 311, are as follows: “Sec. 311. Lewd conduct. Every person who willfully and lewdly, either: . . 3. Writes, composes, stereotypes, prints, publishes, sells, distributes, keeps for sale, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Town of Ryegate v. Town of WardsboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  3. People ex rel. San Francisco & San Joaquin Railway Co. v. CraycroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Pool v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Baker v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
  4. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. PallaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API