Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Krouser v. County of San Bernardino

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1947No. L. A. 19875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents, board of supervisors of the county of San Bernardino and its clerk, to accept for filing a petition for the formation of a municipal corporation signed by certain property owners in the area known as Barstow. The respondents filed an answer as a return to the alternative writ. There is no dispute as to the facts.

The petition for incorporation was presented to the board of supervisors on March 18, 1946, pursuant to the Municipal Corporations Act (Stats. 1883, p. 93, as amended; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5233). Section 2 of that act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sims v. Trinity Farm Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Lenfers v. HenkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. City of Tuscaloosa v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Prunty v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API