Legal Opinion
Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 1999No. 97-160 LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Alameda Gateway, Ltd. (“AGL”), the owner of a 29-acre marine industrial site, seeks compensation from the United States, acting through the Secretary of the Army, for an alleged taking effected by the removal of portions of two piers and the dredging of submerged lands beneath and contiguous to the piers in the inner harbor of Oakland, California. The authority of the Secretary of the Army is exercised in this matter through the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps” or “defendant government” or “defendant”). The Port of Oakland is a…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Alameda Gateway Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- City of Gettysburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.