Legal Opinion

City of Gettysburg v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 16, 2005No. 00-773 LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This takings ease is currently before the court on defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Failure To State A Claim Or In The Alternative For Summary Judgment And Memorandum In Support Thereof. For the reasons set forth herein, defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment is hereby granted.

BACKGROUND

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff, the City of Gettysburg, South Dakota, is an incorporated municipality located in Potter County (City). The City is approximately sixteen miles east of the Oahe Reservoir located on the Missouri River (Reservoir). In the 1960’s, the City obtained…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Nwogu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. North v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API