Legal Opinion

Banks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 23, 2005No. Nos. 99-4451 L, 04-277 LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

I. Background2

Plaintiffs are the owners of property in Michigan “along a four and one-half mile stretch of the eastern shoreline of Lake *525Michigan south of St. Joseph Harbor.” Banks v. United States, 314 F.3d 1304, 1306 (Fed.Cir.2003) (Banks II); Banks v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 778, 778 (2004) (Banks III). Plaintiffs allege that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), by its construction and maintenance of certain jetties at St. Joseph Harbor, has effected a physical taking of plaintiffs’ shoreline property. Banks III, 62 Fed.Cl. at 778-79.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API