Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Ogden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1824PublishedCited by 2,517 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

22 U.S. 1

6 L.Ed. 23

9 Wheat. 1

GIBBONS, Appellant,

v.

OGDEN, Respondent.

March 2, 1824

1

The acts of the Legislature of the State of New-York, granting to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton the exclusive navigation of all the waters within the jurisdiction of that State, with boats moved by fire or steam, for a term of years, are repugnant to that clause of the constitution of the United States, which authorizes Congress to regulate commerce, so far as the said acts prohibit vessels licensed, according to the laws of the United States, for carrying on the coasting trade, from navigating the said…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  4. United States v. BevansSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820

3Cited by2,517 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

2,512 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API