Legal Opinion

Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1895No. 15607PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to change the place of trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco against the defendants to recover from the corporation defendant certain damages that had resulted from its breach of contract with plaintiff, and to recover from the defendant, Merchant, upon an allegation that he is a stockholder in the corporation defendant, his proportionate amount of the corporate liability of his codefendant. The principal place of business of the defendant corporation is in the county of Sonoma, and the residence of Merchant is in the same county. Upon an affidavit showing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hammond v. Ocean Shore Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Aronson & Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API