Trezevant v. W. R. Strong Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an order denying its motion for a change of venue from *48the county of Fresno to the county of Sacramento. The defendant is a corporation, and its principal place of business is in the county of Sacramento. The action is one to recover the value of merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant by the plaintiff, and it was admitted, upon the hearing of the motion in the superior court, that the liability of defendant accrued in the county of Fresno, where the action was commenced. The motion of the defendant for a change of the place…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Cohn v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Jenkins v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
- Lewis v. S. Pac. Coast R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Fresno National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Eddy v. HoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Cook v. W. S. Ray Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Hammond v. Ocean Shore Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.