Legal Opinion
Earl J. Anderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1990No. 88-4377PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Earl J. Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his petition for habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons below, we affirm the district court’s judgment in its entirety.
I
Petitioner was paroled on November 11, 1984, from a five-year federal sentence for larceny. While on parole, Washington officials arrested him for violating the laws of that state. As a result, a federal parole violator warrant for his arrest was issued on February 10, 1987, with a request from the United States Parole Commission (USPC) that it be lodged as a detainer.
After a jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Larry W.G. GiddingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Billy England, Frances England v. Itt Thompson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Armando John Vargas v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Marvin Raines v. U.S. Parole Commission Robert J. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anthony Greenhill v. Harley LappinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cronn v. BurkhartDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
- (HC) Papazian v. B.M. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (HC) Staich v. US Parole CommissionerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Clifton Milton v. J. ShartleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.