(HC) Staich v. US Parole Commissioner
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN VON STAICH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00628-HBK 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS1 13 v. (Doc. No. 15) 14 US PAROLE COMMISSIONER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Ivan Von Staich initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of 18 mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. (Doc. No. 1). Before the Court is Respondent’s motion to 19 dismiss. (Doc. No. 15). Respondent filed an Appendix in support of its motion. (Doc. No. 15-1). 20 Petitioner filed an opposition to the motion.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
- Marion Calvin Tucker v. Peter Carlson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.