Legal Opinion
(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 29, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00392Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES MICHAEL PAPAZIAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00392-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS1 13 v. (Doc. No. 33) 14 B.M. TRATE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner James Michael Papazian (“Petitioner”), a federal inmate, is proceeding pro se 18 on his second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed while he 19 was incarcerated at United States Penitentiary (“USP”) Atwater, located in Merced County, 20 California, which is within the venue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.