Legal Opinion

Billy England, Frances England v. Itt Thompson Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 7, 1988No. 88-8109PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a corporate defendant’s motion to transfer this case from the Columbus Division of the Middle District of Georgia to the Valdosta Division. The district court certified that the order involved a controlling, unsettled question of law, the final resolution of which would advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. A panel of this Court granted the corporate defendant’s application for appeal, establishing our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b). We affirm the denial of the motion for change of venue.

The issue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Howell v. Joe D. Tanner, Individually and as Commissioner of Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968
  3. Torres v. Continental Bus System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1962
  4. Sharp v. Commercial Solvents CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1964
  5. Johnson v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  2. Eason v. Linden Avionics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Earl J. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Johnston v. Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  5. Collegiate Licensing Co. v. American Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API