Legal Opinion
Marvin Raines v. U.S. Parole Commission Robert J. Christensen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1987No. 85-6444PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Marvin Raines, a federal defendant, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. Raines argues that the United States Parole Commission (Commission) erred by not notifying him prior to his parole revocation hearing that his “street time” (time spend on parole) was subject to forfeiture. Raines contends that he is entitled to credit against the remainder of his federal sentence for his good time credits, street time, and for the year he spent in state custody while on federal parole. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Raines was arrested in March of 1975 in Oregon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thomas Dewey Lambert v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Leonard Vanes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sidney Ray Wilkerson v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Marion Calvin Tucker v. Peter Carlson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael John ALBREKTSEN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Charles F. Smith v. United States Parole Commission U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Armando John Vargas v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jose Eduardo Camacho v. O. Ivan White, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.