Legal Opinion
Armando John Vargas v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1988No. 87-15165PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Vargas, (“appellant”) appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his habe-as corpus petition. Vargas alleges that the United States Parole Commission (the “Commission”) violated its regulations by: (1) failing to conduct the preliminary interview within the appropriate time period; (2) failing to conduct a revocation hearing within the statutory time periods, and (3) failing to give him notice of the parole violation charges against him, either after the execution of the warrant or before his revocation hearing. Additionally, he contends that the Commission…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Roberts v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Dale H. Sutherland v. Cecil McCall Chairman, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Stuart Jeffrey PaskowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James H. White v. O. Ivan White, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jose Eduardo Camacho v. O. Ivan White, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.