Johnson v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s blended motion for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment or for a new trial and from the judgment entered.
The facts essential to a determination of the issues involved in this appeal may be briefly stated as follows: In January 1955 plaintiff consulted petitioner Horace Van Valkenburg, an attorney at law practicing his profession in the city of Minneapolis, relative to the commencement of an action for divorce from her husband. The action actually was started in November of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Mankato Mills Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Rhein v. RheinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye v. Peterson, Robert W. Dygert and James P. RorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- In Re Estate of MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Agner v. BournSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Marriage of Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.