Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Murphy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1964No. 39,054, 39,055PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 Minn. 393 (1964)
131 N.W. (2d) 220
IN RE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH CECILIA MURPHY.
GORDON F. O'KEEFE AND OTHERS
v.
GEORGE F. MURPHY AND OTHERS.
Nos. 39,054, 39,055.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
November 6, 1964.
Gordon Rosenmeier and John E. Simonett, for appellants.
Ryan, Ryan & Ebert, for respondent George F. Murphy.
Nolan, Alderman & Holden, for other respondents.
ROGOSHESKE, JUSTICE.
Appellants are the proponents of an undated instrument offered as the last will of Elizabeth Cecilia Murphy, usually known as Bess or Bessie C. Murphy. The instrument was refused probate and this appeal is from an order of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Tobin v. HaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- In Re Dalton EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Hursh v. EdgerlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Romrell v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.