Agner v. Bourn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Defendants, Molly Bourn and John Bourn, appeal from an order of the District Court of Dakota County denying their alternative motions for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment, or for a new trial. The action is one for cancellation of a contract for deed or for damages.
If all conflicts in the evidence are resolved in favor of the prevailing party below, the facts appear to be as follows: Plaintiff, Elizabeth Agner, lived with her husband, George Agner, on a 154-acre farm in Dakota County, which they had acquired in the late 1940’s. They had two…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Fischer v. SperlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Shank v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Maust v. MaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- In Re Estate of StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Robertson v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Norlander v. CronkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. MarcianoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- In Re Estate of OvertonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.