Legal Opinion

Ward v. Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 30, 1962No. 38,323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court in a divorce action requiring the defendant husband to pay, to the attorney for the plaintiff wife, additional attorney’s fees in the sum of $1,000, the sum of $200 having been theretofore paid. The attorney contends that the allowance is inadequate and that he should have been awarded the sum of $3,764.75, including costs.

From the record it appears that Kathleen and Harry H. Ward were married in Minnesota in 1948. They moved to Texas, where the defendant was employed as a geologist for the Standard Oil Company. Two children were born to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Aske v. AskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Krusemark v. KrusemarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Day v. DayIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Borchert v. BorchertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API