Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 7 Div. 595PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBould-In, J.

Beduced to brief and simple phrase, the question presented is: Where a wife brings suit for divorce and alimony, obtains an ex parte order of reference to ascertain a proper allowance for temporary alimony and counsel fees, and pending such order the husband and wife become reconciled and resume cohabitation, can the court proceed, at the instance of her counsel and after the filing of a request by the wife for dismissal of the suit, disclaiming any wish for such allowance, to execute the reference and grant a decree against the husband for counsel fees?

Appellee seems to place main reliance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Anderson v. StegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Brindley v. BrindleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Johnson v. GeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Atkinson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API