Mankato Mills Co. v. Willard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Eorin Cray, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This is an action to recover damages from the defendant upon a written contract to indemnify the plaintiff, as it claims, against any loss it might sustain from the manufacture of certain hosiery covered by letters patent owned by the defendant, for which he was to be paid a royalty. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and as a conclusion of law from the facts found by the court judgment was ordered for the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $2,316.34, with interest. The defendant appealed from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The assignments…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hogan v. VinjeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Shaw v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Brockway v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bjerketvedt v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Bernick v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Winona National & Savings Bank v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- In Re Estate of LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.