Dunlop v. Farmer
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. W. B. Wallace, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendant Farmer, in an action brought by him against plaintiff, caused an attachment to be levied on an automobile belonging to the latter. At the time of the issuance of the attachment Farmer, as principal, and defendants Reed and Davis, as sureties, entered into an undertaking in the sum of $500 to the effect that “if said defendant recovers judgment said plaintiff will pay all costs that may be awarded to the defendant, and all damage which he may have sustained by reason of said attachment, not exceeding the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars.” Dunlop was given judgment in that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Taylor v. BernheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Nahhas v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Atlas Development Co. v. National Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hagele v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1956