Legal Opinion

Atlas Development Co. v. National Surety Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1923No. S. F. No. 10094PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASTE, J.—

This appeal is by the defendant from a directed verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in a suit on an attachment bond.

The facts leading up to the present action are that for some time prior to November 12, 1919, the plaintiff had been engaged in drilling for oil in Contra Costa County and owned and used for the purpose certain oil drilling machinery and equipment. It was about to abandon this enterprise and was starting to dismantle the rig and outfit preparatory to placing it on board the cars at Antioch, in said county, for delivery in the state of Texas to one Charles L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Morgan v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hurd v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McCarthy Co. v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia MutuaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. National Motor Service Co. v. WaltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gray v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Proctor v. ArakelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wiseman v. SklarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API