Legal Opinion
Marzo v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 20, 1945No. Civ. 4664PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
By this motion, plaintiff seeks two-fold relief.
First, pursuant to Rule 34 ot the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, directing the defendant, its officers, attorneys or other persons under its-supervision or direction to produce *380and permit the inspection and copying of the following:
“A. All photographs, reports, journals and records in defendant’s possession or under its control regarding or relating to the accident to the plaintiff, which occurred aboard the S/S Bernard on May 4th, 1944, as described in plaintiff’s complaint and all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Archer v. CornillaudDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- United States ex rel. Edelstein v. Brussell Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Black v. Sheraton Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Wild v. PaysonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Texhoma Stores, Inc. v. American Central Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Holt v. The James SheridanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.