Legal Opinion
Wild v. Payson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 5, 1946No. Civ. 34-307PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
On December 26, 1945 the plaintiffs herein filed a complaint against several corporations and a number of individual defendants alleging damages sustained of five and a half million dollars, by reason of an alleged fraudulent conspiracy and breach of a contract. In November of 1945, one of the defendants named herein, William B. Arness, against whom the action has since' been discontinued, made to the plaintiff Wild, a verbal statement of information obtained by Arness during his employment by one of the defendant corporations, the Alloy Research Corporation, which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Reynolds v. United States. Brauner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Alseike v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.