Legal Opinion
Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 1939PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
These are two motions by the defendant U. S. Rubber Company, and two motions by the defendant U. S. Rubber Products Inc.
The first motion made by each defendant is to vacate, modify or limit the notice of the plaintiff to take the depositions, before the Clerk of the Court or some other officer authorized by law, of the said defendants pursuant to Rule 26 et seq. (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c) by their respective officers, agents or employees having knowledge of the facts upon certain matters specified in the notice.
The second…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Goullon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- McCrate v. Morgan Packing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1939
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Smyth v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Langan v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Rosenblatt v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Momand v. Paramount Pictures Distributing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.