Holt v. The James Sheridan
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Libelant in a suit based on personal injuries moves under Rule 34, F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A-., for the discovery and inspection, with permission to take photographs and measurements of the tug James Sheridan, and to make copies of ten items. The motion is opposed on the ground that respondent served a notice for the examination of libelant under Rule' 26 before the making of the motion for discovery and. inspection and that libelant has not yet submitted himself for examination.-
In taking this position respondent points to the established practice under Rule 26 of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marzo v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
- Gebhard v. Isbrandtsen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- The KegumsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rakes v. FulcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. JanasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Konczakowski v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.