Legal Opinion
Archer v. Cornillaud
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 31, 1941No. 116PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff George Archer sues on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other employees of the defendant similarly situated to recover unpaid wages which he alleges to be due from the defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
The defendant by his answer denies the right of the plaintiff to sue on behalf of other employees alleged to be similarly situated but who are not named in the complaint. The answer also traverses many allegations of the complaint and pleads affirmative defenses, including the claims that the defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Shain v. Armour & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Sonken-Galamba Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Eastern States Corp. v. EislerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.