Legal Opinion

Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 26, 1939No. 507PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on two motions made on behalf of the plaintiff.

I. Motion to compel the defendant to answer the interrogatories heretofore filed in this case, and to which objections have been filed by defendant.

2. Motion for production of specimens and documents.

I will consider the motions separately, and as they are related, one opinion will suffice.

The interrogatories to which defendant objects are interrogatories Nos. 1, 2„ 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Plaintiff not only asks that defendant answer the interrogatories enumerated, but also objects to the answer…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Eastern States Corp. v. EislerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Lever Bros. Co. v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  3. Rekeweg v. Federal Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1961
  4. United Mercantile Agencies v. Silver Fleet Motor Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. United States v. National Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API