Legal Opinion

Dusdal v. City of Warren

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1972No. 21 October Term 1971, Docket No. 52,861PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. E. Brennan, J.

Facts

Plaintiff is the owner of a parcel of land one and one-half (1-1/2) acres, rectangular in shape, being 629 feet deep and 98 feet wide. This property is located on the west side of Hoover Eoad between Ten and Eleven Mile Eoads in the City of Warren.

Plaintiff purchased the property in 1950, when Warren was still a township. The land was then zoned by the township for “multiple use”. We are told that “multiple use” meant that the property could be used for industrial, commercial or residential purposes. Plaintiff’s and surrounding lands were then being used for agricultural purposes.

Whatever…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lamb v. City of MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Padover v. Township of FarmingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Jacobs v. Mishawaka Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Heath Township v. SallMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API