Biske v. City of Troy
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs’ complaint, filed January 21, 1964, presents another zoning cause against the city of Troy. The cause alleged is essentially equitable in nature and differs in that regard from Brae Burn, Inc., v. City of Bloomfield Hills (1957), 350 Mich 425, a case we shall presently consider. Here the equitable features of plaintiffs’ cause are of importance in conjunction with our monotonously repeated precepts that “in determining the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance each case must be determined upon its own facts” 1 and that considerable weight is given to the findings of trial judges…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Tkachik v. MandevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Stachnik v. WinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.