Norton Shores v. Carr
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal the judgment of the trial court holding defendants’ landscaping business, which constitutes a nonconforming use, to be a nuisance. The court ordered it enclosed by a fence. Defendants’ junkyard business, which is also a nonconforming use, was restricted to a certain portion of the defendants’ property. Finally, the trial court found that defendants’ used car business — another nonconforming use — had been abandoned.
On July 24, 1972, plaintiffs filed a complaint charging defendants with violation of a city junkyard ordinance, a zoning ordinance, and an abandoned-vehicle…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Awad v. McColganMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Buddy v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dusdal v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Wayne County v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Redfearn v. CreppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Wronski v. Sun Oil CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Michigan Mutual Insurance v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- McFillan v. Berkeley County Planning CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.