Legal Opinion

Norton Shores v. Carr

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1978No. Docket 77-611PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal the judgment of the trial court holding defendants’ landscaping business, which constitutes a nonconforming use, to be a nuisance. The court ordered it enclosed by a fence. Defendants’ junkyard business, which is also a nonconforming use, was restricted to a certain portion of the defendants’ property. Finally, the trial court found that defendants’ used car business — another nonconforming use — had been abandoned.

On July 24, 1972, plaintiffs filed a complaint charging defendants with violation of a city junkyard ordinance, a zoning ordinance, and an abandoned-vehicle…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Awad v. McColganMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Buddy v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Dusdal v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Redfearn v. CreppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Wronski v. Sun Oil CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. McFillan v. Berkeley County Planning CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API