Legal Opinion · Dissent

Padover v. Township of Farmington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1965No. Calendar 5, Docket 49,906PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1DissentKelly, J.

Plaintiffs filed their hill ■of complaint alleging that defendant township’s zoning ordinance classified plaintiffs’ property as RA-1, thus requiring minimum lot sizes of a width of at least 100 feet and an area averaging 20,000 square feet; that plaintiffs’ land is economically suited for development only if divided into building sites of not more than 12,500 square feet; that the application of the zoning ordinance to plaintiffs’, property unlawfully deprives plaintiffs of the use of the property without due process of law. Plaintiffs concluded their hill of complaint by requesting the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Simon v. Town of NeedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dusdal v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Nickola v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Johnson v. Robinson TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dozier v. Automobile Club of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Muffeny v. City of SouthfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API