Lamb v. City of Monroe
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In one aspect this zoning case is the reverse of" that normally coming to us. Usually a “lower” use seeks to invade the' area of a “higher” úse. The "filling station sought to be erected, in a one-family residential zone is an example. But here the community seeks to exclude residences from one area zoned industrial and commercial.
Most of the facts are stipulated: The problem is primarily legal. The plaintiff is the owner of 124 lots in Harborview subdivision. These lots he purchased from the United States government. They were used during the last war, and through 1953, as a site for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Sandenburgh v. Michigamme Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Frink v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Armstrong v. Ross TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Padover v. Township of FarmingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Dusdal v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Kordick Plumbing and Heating Company v. SarconeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.