Legal Opinion

Heath Township v. Sall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1993No. 92479, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett., J.

We granted leave to determine *436whether defendants established a prior nonconforming use of their property as a mobile home park before passage of a referendum rejecting defendants’ rezoning proposal. The Court of Appeals answered affirmatively. We hold that defendants failed to prove the requisite tangible change in the property to establish a prior nonconforming use.

i

In 1985, defendants Gerald and Joyce Sail purchased approximately 16 acres of land in Heath Township with the intention of building a mobile home park on the property.1 On the purchase date, the land was zoned R-2 (single-family…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Township of Bloomfield v. BeardsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dennis Dubuc v. Township of Green OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Mgm Grand Detroit, LLC v. Community Coalition for Empowerment, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Belvidere Township v. HeinzeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Charter Township of Lyon v. Marlene HoskinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API