Heath Township v. Sall
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett., J.
We granted leave to determine *436whether defendants established a prior nonconforming use of their property as a mobile home park before passage of a referendum rejecting defendants’ rezoning proposal. The Court of Appeals answered affirmatively. We hold that defendants failed to prove the requisite tangible change in the property to establish a prior nonconforming use.
i
In 1985, defendants Gerald and Joyce Sail purchased approximately 16 acres of land in Heath Township with the intention of building a mobile home park on the property.1 On the purchase date, the land was zoned R-2 (single-family…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Township of Bloomfield v. BeardsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Dennis Dubuc v. Township of Green OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Mgm Grand Detroit, LLC v. Community Coalition for Empowerment, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Belvidere Township v. HeinzeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Charter Township of Lyon v. Marlene HoskinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.