Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pullins

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1959No. Civ. 23641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The instant case, based upon a complaint for cancellation of a deed on the ground of undue influence and fraud, assault and battery, and conversion, was tried before the court sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, plaintiff was granted leave to amend her complaint to conform to the proof to allege in her first cause of action a constructive trust and ask for an accounting. The lower court entered judgment for plaintiff thereon and found for defendant on the second and third cause of action. His motion for a new trial was denied and defendant appeals from that portion of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino VillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Murphy v. T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Ornbaun v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Murphy v. T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API