Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino Villas
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MAURO, J.
Picerne Construction Corp. (Picerne) agreed to build an apartment complex for Castellino Villas, A K.F. LLC (Castellino). After construction started, Castellino refinanced the property, replacing the original lender with Bank of the West. Picerne subsequently claimed money due, recorded a mechanic’s lien, and brought this action against Castellino and Bank of the West to foreclose on the lien. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Picerne.
Castellino now contends (1) Picerne does not have a valid mechanic’s lien because it did not record its…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino Villas, A. K. F. LLC (In Re Castellino Villas, A. K. F. LLC)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Hall CA-NV v. Old RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Precision Framing Sys. Inc. v. Luzuriaga, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Goldmex v. Glendale I Mall Assoc. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Montpelier Nut Co. v. Ditzler CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.