Legal Opinion
In Re Ruffalo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 4, 1965No. C 64-366PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATTISTI, District Judge:
On May 20, 1964, the Supreme Court of Ohio ordered that Respondent John Ruffalo, Jr., be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Ma- honing County Bar Association v. Ruffalo, 176 Ohio St. 263, 199 N.E.2d 396 (1964). This order became final and effective when, on December 7, 1964, the Supreme Court of the United States denied Bespondent’s petition for certiorari. Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Association, 379 U.S. 931, 85 S.Ct. 328, 13 L.Ed.2d 342 (1964).
Buie 1(E) of this Court’s rules provides in part as follows:
“E. Disbarment and Discipline. Any…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In the Matter of John Ruffalo, JrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In the Matter of John Ruffalo, JrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.