Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Ruffalo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1968No. 73Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice White, with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins,

concurring in the result.

The Court reverses petitioner’s disbarment by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit because petitioner had inadequate notice prior to his earlier state disbarment proceeding of the charges which the Mahoning County Bar Association was bringing against him at that proceeding. The state disbarment, however, is not before us. We denied a petition for certiorari seeking review of it. Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Assn., 379 U. S. 931 (1964). Our writ in the instant case extends only to petitioner’s disbarment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. In the Matter of John Ruffalo, JrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. In Re RuffaloDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API