Gray v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Appellants brought separate actions against respondents to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident. The actions were consolidated for trial and the jury was regularly sworn to try the issues. After a five weeks’ trial, the jury rendered separate verdicts in favor of the appellants, upon which judgments were entered. Thereafter, respondents moved for a new trial in each action upon all the statutory grounds and in support thereof filed certain affidavits, including affidavits of three jurors who had dissented from the verdict. The order granting respondents’ motions shows that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.